Sigrid replaces opaque, side-of-the-trade reconciliation with a shared pair room backed by deterministic identity and field-level diffs.
| Status | Match | Reason | CP | Aging |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| break | MCH-8821-FZQ2 | Rate / spread | UBS | 23m |
| break | MCH-8822-LMD9 | Dates | J.P. Morgan | 47m |
| awaiting | MCH-8823-VNT7 | — | BlackRock | 1h 24m |
| break | MCH-8824-RK1P | Notional | UBS | 2h 15m |
Sigrids are derived from canonical trade terms. Identical canonical inputs produce identical Sigrids. Different inputs produce different Sigrids — there is no ambiguity about whether two sides agree on the trade.
A shared operating surface scoped to a specific pair of counterparties. Both sides see the same queue, the same statuses, and the same field-level break detail.
Open a break to see both sides' canonical attestations, the exact field-level diff, and the reason taxonomy. Accept the counterparty's version, add a note, or mark investigating — all in one place.
Awaiting items get their own aging buckets, not just timestamps. Both sides see the same bucket (fresh / warm / hot / SLA) and can open an item and take shared ownership.
Every note, action, and status change is scoped to a match and recorded with actor, party, and timestamp. Designed to be the authoritative shared log between two desks.
We have 37.25 confirmed from the trader.
Our booking shows 37.30, investigating.
Amendments and novations don't fragment the story. Related Sigrids are nodes on a shared timeline from root to current, visible to both counterparties.